[ad_1]
New Delhi : Amid the ongoing tussle with the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government in Punjab, Governor Banwarilal Purohit told the Supreme Court that he has called a budget session of the assembly on March 3. The Supreme Court told both the parties that constitutional discussion should be held with dignity and mature governance skills. The Supreme Court was hearing the state government’s plea against the alleged ‘refusal’ of the governor to convene the budget session on March 3.
The government is bound to give information to the governor
The Supreme Court said that the Punjab government is bound to provide the information sought by the governor and similarly the governor is bound to accept the recommendations of the cabinet regarding convening of the assembly session. He said that the governor of Punjab is bound by the advice of the ministers, so there is no point in taking legal advice on whether the governor should call the budget session or not.
Solicitor General opposed the petition
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the governor, told a bench headed by Chief Justice (CJI) DY Chandrachud that in view of the governor’s decision to convene the assembly session, the petition filed by the Punjab government has no merit. The bench took note of this report. The court said that this court understands the freedom of speech and expression, but constitutional discussion, especially in the context of constitutional dialogue between officers, should be done with a sense of decorum and mature governance skills. Justice PS Narasimha was also included in the bench.
deal with political differences wisely
The Supreme Court said that political differences are acceptable in a democratic system and should be dealt with sensibly. If these principles are not kept in mind, the effective implementation of constitutional values will be in jeopardy. Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for the Punjab government, said that a constitutional authority is ignoring the constitution.
Governor did not refuse the session
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta told the Supreme Court that the petition filed by the Punjab government was unnecessary and not maintainable. He said that the governor never denied and he said that he is taking legal advice. Earlier, the court had agreed to hear on Tuesday a petition filed against the governor’s decision to ‘refusal’ to convene the assembly session. Singhvi had requested for an urgent hearing on the matter on Tuesday itself.
Deadlock between the government and the governor
The standoff between Punjab Governor Banwari Lal Purohit and the government led by Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann escalated last week after Purohit indicated that he was in no hurry to convene the budget session of the Assembly and referred to a letter from the Raj Bhavan to Chief Minister Mann. Offensive’ answer reminded. In that letter, dated February 13, the governor had asked Mann to explain the process of selecting 36 headmasters of government schools for a training seminar held recently in Singapore. He had also raised many other issues in the letter. The Punjab cabinet had decided to hold the assembly session on March 3 and requested the governor to call a meeting of the house.
[ad_2]
Source link