Major revelations in the Kotakpura shooting case filed by the SIT – Punjabi news | Big revelations in the challan presented by the SIT in the Kotakpura shooting case, know full details in punjabi


Faridkot. Happened in 2015 Kotakpura shooting incident (Kotakpura shooting) Four challans have been presented against the accused in the case, in which the first challan of about 7000 pages, the second challan of 2400 pages, the third challan of 2500 pages and the fourth challan of 22 pages was presented on September 15. Where the investigation committee made former Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal, former Home Minister Sukhbir Singh Badal, former DGP Sumedh Saini and many other police officers accused in this case.

There, the then SHO Gurdeep Singh Pandher and some others were made accused in this case Police personnel (Police) By filing an application in the court against the protestors who attacked the policemen on this occasion, the SIT did not present any facts in its investigation.

Protesters snatched police guns

In this case, Gurdeep Singh Pandher’s lawyer Amit Gupta said that in the Kotakpura shooting case, the challans that have been presented in the court so far by the SIT. According to him, during the incident, the rifles of two police personnel were lost by the protesters and the main witness of this case, Ajit Singh, was shot in the thigh. She walked in the direction of Muktsar road side protesters. They ran in this direction after snatching the rifle, which can be clearly seen in the video if you look carefully.

This investigation has not been conducted impartially-lawyer

He said that the SIT has also presented that video in the court through CD. In it, one demonstrator is seen running away towards Faridkot Road and the other towards Muktsar Road after taking the rifle from two policemen. The lawyer said that we have been demanding from the beginning that no facts of any kind have been collected from the leaders of the protestors during the investigation, so many questions are raised on the investigation that this investigation has not been conducted impartially.


Source link