[ad_1]
Ankit Sharma Murder Case: In Delhi riots in the year 2020 IB officer Ankit Sharma had been murdered. Recently a big update has come out regarding this matter. A Delhi court has framed charges against 10 others, including former Aam Aadmi Party leader Tahir Hussain, in this case. For information, let us tell you that ED had also registered a case of money laundering against Tahir Hussain and in that case also charges have been framed against the former Aam Aadmi Party leader.
Charged with multiple offenses
In 2020, a Delhi court Delhi Charges were yesterday framed against Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Tahir Hussain and 10 others for several offences, including kidnapping and murder, in connection with the alleged murder of Intelligence Bureau (IB) officer Ankit Sharma in a riot case. Additional Sessions Judge Pulastya Pramachala was hearing the case registered at Dayalpur police station against 11 accused, including Hussain, on the complaint of the officer’s father.
dead body recovered from drain
Ankit Sharma’s body was recovered from Khajuri Khas drain near Chand Bagh bridge. The judge said- I think that the accused named Mohammad Tahir Hussain, Haseen, Nazim, Qasim, Sameer Khan, Anas, Firoz, Javed, Gulfam, Shoaib Alam and Muntazim are guilty of sections 147 (rioting), 148 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) (rioting, armed with deadly weapon) and can be prosecuted for offenses punishable under 153A (promoting enmity between groups on grounds of religion etc.), 302 (murder) and 120B (criminal conspiracy).
Charges framed in money laundering case as well
Let us tell you that in the month of February, the Supreme Court refused to interfere in the process of framing charges against Tahir Hussain under the Money Laundering Act. At that time, the bench of Justice V Ramasubramanian and Justice Pankaj Mitthal had said that the court cannot go into the details at the stage of framing of charges, which will be seen at a later stage. Talking further, the bench had told that- this matter is currently in the phase of framing of charges under PMLA and this is the reason why there is no need to interfere in this phase. (with language input)
[ad_2]
Source link