The controversies that have been coming up about non-veg food for the last few years in the month of Sawan, the holy Shravan of Sanatani Hindus or in the month of Ashwin, appeared this time and lost their policy importance among the petty politics of the party. At the same time, swords have been drawn between the ruling party and the opposition regarding the way non-veg was also served in the central hall of the so-called NDA-ruled Bihar Legislative Assembly on Monday.
Similarly, the matter of clarifying the identity of shop owners at dhabas and eateries located on Kawad Yatra Marg in UP also arose in the Supreme Court. It is clear that there is food at the original here too. Therefore, again the question is irrelevant as to what one eats, what not, it is a completely personal matter and such a dispute could be avoided. But such so-called secular and Western Law Advocates should know that Indian society has been a sensitive and cultured society for centuries, where there is a clear belief that a person’s mind is directly related to food.
Also read this: Kanwar Yatra- Amazing confluence of religion, culture, tradition and social harmony
It has also been said that the food should be made as a food, the mind becomes. Therefore, it is the duty of the king or ruler to enact a law to receive pure and elegant food to the people and monitor him continuously. Since vegetarian food has been promoted in Indian society to enjoy healthy life. Therefore, such people do not get the bad odor of eggs, eggs, meat and fish, it is also the work of administration to monitor it.
At the same time, companies associated with food business do not deliver non-vegetarian products to vegetarian people, do not deliver adulterated vegetarians equal, it is also the religion of administration to see. If he turns away from his moral obligations under the guise of secularism, then he has no moral right to rule India. Therefore, the BJP-led NDA government of the country, or BJP governments or NDA governments of various states, are trying to maintain an environment friendly to the people on special festivals.
It is generally believed that Gurukul, Brahmacharya and Vegetarianism were discouraged on Sanatan land during the Islamic rule and during the British rule. Which promoted many social evils such as prostitution and immoral crime with cotton culture. This is because the human attitude distorted by eating contaminated food and drinking contaminated beverages.
Therefore, it can be said that the moral decline of liberal and tolerant Indian society, sometimes the situation gets out of the control of the police and paramilitary forces, it is directly related to the food of anti-social elements. Therefore, all aspects of this important issue should be considered fairly. In this case, the track record of modern administration has been very bad, otherwise fatal adulteration Khori is not found so much. Media reports have also been cheating this.
As far as personal election is concerned, it can apply to their home, not in public places at all. There is no doubt that someone likes to eat and drink
The person’s identity and part of his culture are part. Therefore, the variety of culture has been there in India, similarly the diversity in the food here is well known. Therefore, what should someone eat, whether it should be policing or not, is a matter of dispute.
Needless to say that as the law does not allow anyone to eat poison, the market things prevalent in the form of sweet poison should also be investigated and if they are unfavorable in terms of public health, then they should also be prevented unintentionally. The same should also apply to non -vegetarians, because it also promotes various types of infectious microbes in the human body. Bird flu is an important example of this.
Some people say that people’s catering police monitoring or any such effort will be a violation of that Article 21 of the Constitution, which guarantees the fundamental right of life and personal freedom. Therefore food and dress are also part of this personal freedom. But it should only be within the boundary wall of the house, that too until the neighbor has objections.
This is because in modern flat culture, the aroma or odor of a house kitchen reaches the bedroom of neighbors. Therefore food is a thing of private choice, but it is also the moral responsibility of the non -vegetarians to respect the feelings of the Baggir, because some vegetarian people vomit with bad odor. This also puts their life in danger.
Therefore, it is not a matter of political dispute, but can be considered a symbol of political understanding. One of the biggest drawbacks of Indian politics is felt that even in the last seven-eight decades, it has not been successful in making our executive, judiciary and media public welfare. Democracy and Western democratic values, which themselves run according to their convenience, are blindly implemented in India. Therefore, the question of widespread public interest is practically left far behind.
However, even after this, there have been disputes about non-veg food in Sawan for the last few years. If seen, politics is at the core of most. Two years ago in Bihar, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s RJD supremo Lalu Prasad Yadav’s daughter on Sawan also became a political issue. A few days ago, when Biryani Bunty in Prashant Kishore’s party, there was an uproar and clarifying that it was a veg!
This is the reason why everyone needs policy balance regarding catering. Therefore, the problem that arises on mixing faith with food, the same problem is said to be standing even after ignoring it. Since both are private matters and both do not have the right to interfere. Yes, it is definitely that when it is related to the sentiments of a community on a particular event or religious occasion, there is a need for balance between the constitutional rights of all the parties there. The same thing has happened.
At the same time, food is also a question of dignity of a person. Actually, food is also associated with the dignity of a person, not only by hunger. It gives the right to earn and eat with respect to all the citizens of this country. Due to any reason, there should not be an attempt to snatch these rights. Then it should also be seen that food should not be used on the board of politics. Also, this politics should not affect people’s livelihood.
After all, we have to believe that food like a bhajan is also a matter of vocal. But the way hymn is associated with terrorism and disintegration, some apprehension is also taking birth about food. Therefore, when the solution of this complex issue will be found in accordance with the Indian civilization-culture, then I hope that the public sentiment of the vegetarian people will not be hurt.
– Kamlesh Pandey
Senior journalist and political analyst