Years
The Supreme Court gave the Karnataka government a day’s time to inform the state about the release of the film ‘Thug Life’, saying that the rule of law should be established.
The Supreme Court said that the mob cannot be allowed to capture the streets, the film ‘Thug Life’ should be released in Karnataka. Regarding the release of ‘Thug Life’ in Karnataka, the Supreme Court said that the law says that the film CBFC has approved will have to be released in every state. People cannot be allowed to be frightened and threatened to burn theaters. The Supreme Court said that the Karnataka High Court should not have asked him to apologize for Kamal Haasan’s statement.
The Supreme Court gave the Karnataka government a day’s time to inform the state about the release of the film ‘Thug Life’, saying that the rule of law should be established. If actor Kamal Haasan has said something, then let people debate on it but the film cannot be prevented from releasing in theaters. The Supreme Court transferred the petition filed by the producer of the film to the Karnataka High Court and asked the state government to file a reply. It questioned the role of the High Court, especially on the suggestion that the actor should apologize for resolving the issue. When a person makes a statement and all join it, there is something wrong in the system. Why should the High Court say ‘apologize’? This is not his role. It emphasized that once a film takes approval from the Central Film Certification Board (CBFC), it should be allowed to be released.
The court said that people can choose not to see it. But we cannot allow threats and threats to decide whether a film would be released or not. “The court cited previous decisions to support the argument, including the decision of the Bombay High Court in the MI Nathuram Boltoy drama case and the decision of Imran Pratapgadhi that separate views should be allowed in democracy.
Other news