Years
During the court proceedings, the Additional Solicitor General (ASG), appearing for the government, said they are withdrawing the order. The ASG said that we are withdrawing the order only because its format has been questioned. “The Center further said that it would reconsider the matter and take appropriate decisions. The court asked earlier, saying that we recommended the deduction, where did you get this right? Where did you get the right to amend the board? Do you have any right? Do you have any right?
The Delhi High Court on Friday ordered the Central Government to re -evaluate the film “Udaipur Files” related to the killing of tailor Kanhaiya Lal in 2022. The court raised the question whether the Center could order editing and cut under its revision jurisdiction. The court directed that the revaluation be completed by August 6 and requested to follow the existing legal criteria. The court order came after the government said that it would withdraw the previous directive in which the film was allowed to be released with a specific cut. The court emphasized the importance of following the Center’s revision jurisdiction under the Cinematograph Act, which controls the certification and release of films in India.
Also read this: What is Microsoft and Nayara’s case? Learn how the Indian company got trapped, the case reached the High Court
During the court proceedings, the Additional Solicitor General (ASG), appearing for the government, said they are withdrawing the order. The ASG said that we are withdrawing the order only because its format has been questioned. “The Center further said that it would reconsider the matter and take appropriate decisions. The court asked earlier, saying that we recommended the deduction, where did you get this right? Where did you get the right to amend the board? Do you have any right? Do you have any right?
Also read this: 10 years in jail … big game with Imran Khan, there is a ruckus in Pakistan
The court investigated the jurisdiction of the central government under the Cinematograph Act and found that it could only issue general principles under Section 5 (2) of the Cinematograph Act or disqualify a film for certification. The limits of the government’s rights were the focal point of investigation of the court, and it was emphasized that any action remained under the purview of the Act.
Other news