Assembly Speaker Sandhawan, who came to talk to farmers in Faridkot and farmer leader sitting in the room for meeting.
Assembly Speaker Kulatar Singh Sandhawan faced strong opposition from farmers in programs organized in government schools under the Shiksha Kranti Abhiyan in Faridkot, Punjab. When the police stopped the farmers from moving forward in village Mishriwala, the village Chandba
.
The farmers allege that the assembly speaker refused to talk to them in the presence of the media. In protest, the farmers raised their protest by shouting slogans. However, the speaker says that the farmers did not want to have a real conversation, but only wanted to make videos.
Assembly speaker Kultar Singh Sandhawan interacting with reporters.
Farmers wanted to answer and answer the assembly speaker
The United Kisan Morcha non -political had announced to surround the Aam Aadmi Party leaders in protest against the abolition of their front from Khanouri and Shambhu border. Under this, the farmer leaders wanted to question the assembly speaker.
Farmer leader Sona Singh and other leaders clarified that they wanted to discuss the reasons for the speaker to abolish the farmer front and other demands of the farmers. But the speaker refused to negotiate in the presence of the media.
Police force deployed on the spot.
Assembly speaker accused of making video only
Assembly Speaker Kultar Singh Sandhawan said that he was ready to respond to the farmers. He alleged that the farmers did not want to communicate real, but only wanted to make videos, due to which the meeting could not succeed.
On Thursday, the speaker inaugurated development schemes in government schools in Mishriwala, Moran Wali, Ghumiara and Chandbaza during his visit. However, the announcement of farmers’ protests saw a clear impact on these programs.
Farmer leader Sona Singh giving information.
Most of the chairs remained empty in the ceremony
Most of the chairs remained empty at the ceremony held at village Chandbaza’s school, which reflects the influence of the peasant movement. This situation makes it clear that the peasant movement is also affecting government programs at the local level.
The administration tried to control the situation and made arrangements to introduce the farmers to the speaker, but the two sides could not agree. Differences between the two sides about the presence of media were clearly revealed.