[ad_1]
In the last three financial years (2019-20 to 2021-22), the Jharkhand government received Rs 8340.78 crore from coal royalty. There are three subsidiary units of Coal India in the state. In this, the maximum royalty is received from CCL. The state gets an average annual royalty of around Rs 2,700 crore from the three companies. Coal India has three mining companies (BCCL, CCL and ECL) operating in Jharkhand. In addition, a research unit (CMPDI) is functioning. ECL is headquartered in Asansol, but some of its mines are located in Jharkhand. Its royalty is received by the Government of Jharkhand.
Received royalty of more than three thousand crores last year
Last year, Jharkhand had received more than Rs 3028 crore as royalty from the three companies. In 2019-20, about Rs 2754.16 crore was received as revenue. And in 2020-21, Jharkhand got about Rs 2558 crore as revenue.
How much royalty was received from which company in the financial year
Central Coalfields Limited
2021- 22 1657.38
2020- 21 1331.37
2019- 20 1208.27
Eastern Coalfields Limited
2021- 22 208.37
2020- 21 315.53
2019- 20 494.87
Bharat Coking Coal Limited
2021- 22 1162.51
2020- 21 911.46
2019- 20 1051.02
(Amount in Rs. Crore)
JBVNL seeks objection on tariff proposal
Jharkhand State Electricity Regulatory Commission (JBVNL) has issued a tariff petition for the financial year 2021-22 seeking objections from the general public. This tariff petition was filed in November 2020. But due to non-appointment of chairman and members in the commission, the decision on this tariff could not be taken. Now that the chairman and members have started working fully in the Jharkhand State Electricity Regulatory Commission, then the process of tariff has started again. The commission directed JBVNL to invite objections from the public on the tariff for the financial year 2021-22. After this, JBVNL has issued an advertisement inviting objections on the tariff. However, in the meantime, JBVNL filed a tariff petition for the financial year 2022-23 on 30 November 2021. On this too, due to non-availability of members in the commission, the hearing could not be held.
[ad_2]
Source link