The world’s most ancient civilization-culture ‘Sanatan Dharma’ with Indian backgrounds, ‘Sanatan Dharma “, should no longer be taken in giving proper answers to the constant attacks that are being done.
Recently, Jitendra Awhad, MLA of the so -called secular and opportunistic regional party NCP Sharad Pawar, sparked a new controversy, saying that Sanatan Dharma ruined India and described its ideology, it is very unaware, imperfect and prejudiced and prejudice, as much as it is, it is less to be condemned.
Also read this: Questions arising from Congress conspiracies against RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat
At the same time, his party should be resigned by clearing his stand against the public representatives who made such derogatory remarks on the Sanatan civilization-culture, which is considered the soul of India, otherwise the Election Commission should take action against such public representatives and end the recognition of the political party related to them without any delay.
Otherwise, the message will be sent to the public that there are such eternal opponents sitting in favor of the Executive Administration and Judicial Administration, who are in favor of secularism, who are also generous on the attackers of India’s oldest civilization-culture in the same way as Mughal or English administrator or Congress politicians.
It is noteworthy that this statement of the above MLA came after the acquittal of all the seven accused in the 2008 Malegav blast case by the court, which has once again warmed out the political debate on the political debate on the last one and a half decades over the term saffron/Hindu terror.
It is strange that while talking to journalists, Awhad said that Sanatan Dharma ruined India. There was no religion by the name Sanatan Dharma. We are followers of Hinduism. This was the alleged Sanatan Dharma that obstructed the coronation of our Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj. This Sanatan Dharma maligned our Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj. Followers of this Sanatan Dharma attempted to kill Jyotirao Phule.
He threw cow dung and dirt at Savitribai Phule. This Sanatan Dharma was involved in the conspiracy to assassinate Shahu Maharaj. This did not even allow Ambedkar to drink water or study in school. At the same time, Rane and Sanjay Nirupam have also replied to Awhad’s Sanatan Dharma and Sanatan Samaj statements. Maharashtra Cabinet Minister Nitesh Rane said on Jitendra Awhad’s statement that a language like ‘Hindu terrorism’ or ‘Sanatani Terrorism’ is a definition to discredit the Hindu and saint tradition of India.
The bottom line of this reaction of Rane is that the Congress, which has become more negative towards Hindu society, was punished by the countrymen, and excluded the central power, causing the Congress to be furious. His people are making mistakes from strategic mistakes to draw Muslim votes from socialists. By doing this, they can capture the politics of opposition, but even after 15 years, the central power will prove to be a distant Delhi for them.
At the same time, BJP national spokesperson and MP Sambit Patra targeted the so -called “ecosystem” of the Congress, saying that he is intent on defaming Sanatan Dharma and using words like Hindu terror. He also referred to the recent statements of former Congress Chief Minister Prithviraj Chavan in which he has coined a new jumla of Sanatan terrorism.
Citing the latest controversial statement of NCP MLA Jitendra Awhad, MP Sambit Patra said that “Awhad is the leader of Maharashtra and belongs to Sharad Pawar’s party. He has once again used the derogatory language for Sanatan Dharma. You have insulted the truth, spoken against Shiva, spoken against Shiva and opposed the beauty of that India. Does this your party think the same, clarify? “
At the same time, Shiv Sena leader Sanjay Nirupam wrote on social media, ‘Jitendra Awhad has narrated a lot of fake stories to defame Sanatan Dharma. They forgot to tell that if there was no Sanatan Dharma, then he would not have become Jitendra Jittuddin till now. If there were no Sanatani, the country would have become Saudi Arabia.
Explain that former Chief Minister of Maharashtra Prithviraj Chavan has advocated the use of Sanatan or Hindutva words instead of the word saffron. After acquitting all the culprits in the Malegaon blast case, Chavan supported the ban on the Sanatan organization’s involvement in terrorist activities. He has said that the words ‘Sanatan’ or ‘Hindutva’ should be used by not using the word ‘saffron’ for terrorists. He also gave historical references in support of his views.
Chavan said, “The ‘Sanatan’ organization during my Chief Minister’s period was involved in terrorist activities.” I sent a confidential report to the Union Home Ministry to ban this organization. In the same context, I used the word ‘Sanatan’, because the function of that organization was of terrorist tendency. This organization should have been banned.
He gave Dr. Narendra Dabholkar and Co. Referring to the killings of Govind Pansare, he said that what happened to him and why justice has not been received till date is a serious question.
He raised the question and said, ‘Operation vermilion was to be discussed in the House, at the same time, is a coincidence of the Mumbai serial blast and the Malegaon decision? When Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis was running the Malegaon case, the statement made, it was a serious matter.
Chavan has also questioned Union Home Minister Amit Shah. He said, ‘Amit Shah is the Union Home Minister for the last 15 years, but the investigating agencies have not done justice during this period. All this has been done under a well thought out strategy. The government should appeal to the High Court in both the Mumbai blasts and Malegaon cases.
According to Chavan, no religion is a terrorist, but the ideology of Nathuram Godse belonged to the Sangh. Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel at one time banned the Sangh. He also made it clear that Chidambaram, Sushil Kumar Shinde and Digvijay Singh used the word ‘saffron terrorism’, but I and my party did not agree with that word and still not today. That is why Sanatani is called terrorism.
The reality is that India was ruined by foreign invaders and Congress. After the attainment of independence, the then Hinduist Congress cheated the Hindus while doing politics of appeasement. By the time the Hindu society understood it, it was too late. The works of Hindu interest which should have been started in 1947 itself started in 1998-99, but they got the right pace after 2014.
The so -called secularism is still the biggest obstacle in this path. If it protects Islamic and Christianity, then Hindus break the creed of Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains etc. This makes Hindu society agitated. He is waiting for the Yogi rule, so that the rejuvenation of the entire country can be possible like UP.
– Kamlesh Pandey
Senior journalist and political analyst
(The author has his own views in this article.)