New Delhi52 minutes ago
- Copy link
A petition was filed in the Supreme Court, alleging that the Indian government forcibly thrown 43 Rohingya refugees into the sea and sent it to Myanmar. It was also said that these refugees included women, children, elderly and people suffering from serious diseases.
On 16 May, the Supreme Court reprimanded the petitioner while hearing this petition. Justice Suryakant said that this is a very beautifully fabricated story.
The court refused to stay the exile of the Rohingya refugees. At the same time, the request of the immediate hearing of the petitioners was also rejected. The case was postponed till 31 July 2025 with pending petitions.
On the UN report said- people sitting outside cannot challenge sovereignty
During the hearing, the petitioner cited the United Nations report. On this, a bench of Justice Suryakant, Justice Dipankar Dutta and Justice N. Kotishwar Singh said that people sitting outside cannot challenge our sovereignty.
The petitioner’s counsel Colin Gonzalvis told the court that people were deported and thrown into the sea. Now they are in the war zone.
On this argument, Justice Kant asked some questions “Who is the person who saw him. Who recorded the video. The petitioner said that he was there, how he came back.”
Gonzalvis said that the petitioners living in India received calls. On this, Justice Kant said, the country is going through a difficult period, so you are bringing such imaginary ideas.
Government put its side- we do not implement international law
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta of the Government of India told the court that India considers Rohingya refugees to be illegal migrants. Therefore, their exile process is done according to the law. He also said that India is not a signator of the United Nations Refugee Conference, so international refugee laws do not apply to it.
Dodge during hearing mentioned citizenship of people
Advocate Gonzalvis cited the decision given in the case of NHRC and Arunachal Pradesh. It said that non-citizens also have fundamental rights of life and freedom. After this, the Dodge people have been prevented from being illegally evicted. However, Justice Kant said that in that case the central government had told the court that the dodge people are being considered to give Indian citizenship. Therefore, the court has provided relief in this case.
Petitioner’s claim- Called on the pretext of raising data, tied the eye on the eye and sent the port Blair
PIL has been filed by two Rohingya refugees in Delhi. It alleges that the people of his group were detained by the Delhi Police on the pretext of collecting biometric data. He was then taken to vans and buses. Many police stations were detained for 24 hours. After this he was kept at Indralok Detention Center in Delhi. Eventually Port Blair was taken, where they were forcibly placed on naval ships and tied their hands. The bandage was also tied on the eyes.
The petitioner claims that even though India has not signed the United Nations Refugee Conference of 1951, the principle of non-vapous (which prohibits the expenses of a refugee in his original country due to its identity due to its identity) has been judicially accepted.