Bangladesh and Nepal were trying to show their eyes, India treated both of them with tapak

The geopolitics of South Asia took a new twist when the interim government of Bangladesh tried to drag India into domestic politics by raising the issue of alleged activities of Awami League, while Nepal once again questioned the India-China business agreement by claiming the claim on lipule. In both cases, India gave a befitting reply to Tapak. Bangladesh was reminded that the land of India cannot become a base for the politics of any other country. At the same time it was clarified to Nepal that the trade from Lipulekh has been going on since 1954 and claims cannot be durable without historical facts.
If seen, this kind of answer of India has sent a message at many levels. For example, India wants harmony with neighbors, but national interests are paramount. Apart from this, the interim government of Bangladesh has been indicated that India will not become a part of its internal power struggle, but will keep an eye on restoring the democratic process. The message has been sent to Nepal and China that India will not accept any pressure on its strategic boundaries and trade routes.

Also read this: Rare Earth Magnets has a relaxation of china on temporary relief, solution is hidden in self -sufficiency

India has shown that he wants friendship with neighbors, but friendship does not mean surrender. Both Dhaka and Kathmandu have to understand that dialogue with India is possible, but pressure or inappropriate claims will not be accepted. This is a new India that hears, but also gives answers in strict tone when needed.
As far as the Bangladesh episode is concerned, let us tell you that the interim government there had demanded from India to shut down the alleged Bangladesh Awami League offices and activities in Delhi and Kolkata. The Bangladesh government described it as “a direct insult against Dhaka and its people”. India’s answer to this was very clear that our land cannot be used for political activities against any other country. At the same time, India also reminded Dhaka that it wants independent, fair and inclusive elections to be held soon in Bangladesh. India made it clear to Bangladesh that it is “wrong” to drag India in its internal political tussle. At the same time, India indirectly put pressure on the Yunus government to extend the democratic process soon.
Talking about the Nepal episode, let us tell you that Nepal objected to the restarting of the trade between India and China through the Lipulekh Pass. Nepal claims that Lipulekh, Kalapani and Limpiadhura are its land and have been certified by the Sugauli Treaty of 1816. To this, India replied that India-China trade from Lipulekh Pass continues from 1954, which was stopped for Kovid and other reasons. Now it has been resumed. India said that Nepal’s claims are not based on history and facts. India has said that any kind of “unilateral artificial expansion” is unacceptable. If seen, this response is a direct indication to Nepal that India will not back down from its strategic and historical status and will not leave business interests under any kind of pressure.
However, both these incidents are sure to have a widespread impact on the politics of South Asia as India used the “strict but diplomatic” language on both fronts without any inclination. This sent a message that India would not bow back in front of the inappropriate demands of its neighbors. These reactions also indicate that India is maintained on the policy of friendship, but national interest and strategic regional security is paramount. This development gives a message in South Asia that India is not only firm in protecting its interests, but has emerged as a decisive power in regional politics.

Source link