After all, why are the Prime Minister of India, Modi, who is taking the risk of injury by relying on China?

Whenever a Prime Minister of our country wants to increase love and trust peenga in the name of global diplomacy from enemy countries like China, Pakistan and Bangladesh, or the only question arises in my mind that these leaders do not have knowledge of history, or these leaders are unlikely, or have these geographical truths. Do they not remember the faces of those brave soldiers and communal riots, terrorism, Naxalism, organized crime, their widows and children, old parents, etc. whose only causes of untimely death have not been remembered by their widows and children, old parents etc.

For example, the question here is not of the mentality of domination of any occupied pieces or communal mood, but is associated with the unfortunate political-administrative decisions that our brave soldiers and common men have to pay. As former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Bajpayee said that we can change history, but not geography, I would like to only argue so much that you let history and geography remain unchanged, just change the subject of your political science.

Also read this: For Modi, Putin did what India was waiting, Ajit Doval revealed, Trump will get up on hearing

You should know that political science change is modesty, so make it friendly to our brave soldiers and common men. You will also realize that our Dalit-backward people do not understand these micro-administrative nuances, so do not wait for any mandate for this important change, but take decisions from your inter-soul. I am raising this because Prime Minister Narendra Modi can visit China later this month to attend the summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). The conference is to be held on 31 August and 1 September in Tianjin, the northern city of China.

The question is that he is taking such unexpected steps when the wounds found by the US-China-inspired Hindu terrorist Pahalgam attack and Operation Sindoor have not been spent for long, while this will be Modi’s first China visit after a clash between India and China troops in the Galwan Valley of East Ladakh in 2020. He went to China earlier in 2018.

The direct question is that when Prime Minister Modi was so upset with the Galwan military clash that he did not go to China for five consecutive years, then why are you doing this immediately after the Pahalgam scandal? Is your conscience dead now or do you seem to be eager to lay the foundation of the next Chinese deception after getting unexpected American deception! Do you not know that China, who tease Jawaharlal Nehru and Narendra Modi’s goodwill, can never be the real of India.

The smoldering question is that when the nature of China has not changed from the year 1962 to the year 2020, then what policy charisma is expected again. Have he forgotten the Doklam clash? Have he forgotten Tawang Dansi? Don’t they remember Bomdila? Will this journey of yours change his petty mindset from Ladakh to Arunachal Pradesh? Will its nature of surrounding India to surround India?

Here I can understand that a trio of traitors and officials-industrialists on some of our effectively effective, showing transient benefits, made the Indian economy dependent on the Chinese economy under American pressure. But to overcome this problem, UPA Prime Minister Manmohan Singh was given the central power to NDA Prime Minister Narendra Modi after 10 years out of power. You have been in power for the last 11 years, but it seems unable to understand that the attempt of Chinese friendship under Russian pressure will prove to be a foolish step like hitting an ax in your own leg. Know that history repeats itself and you cannot avoid it.

My clear opinion is that the growing close close to China-Iran amidst the US will not be in India’s favor. It is reported that PM Narendra Modi may meet Chinese President Xi Chinfing at the SCO Leaders Summit. At the same time, he can also have a bilateral meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin. At the same time, PM is also scheduled to visit Japan a day before the visit of China. The Indian Ministry of External Affairs has not given any formal statements at present about both these visits. But for some time, relations between India and China have been in the direction of normal.

Last month, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar was on a visit to China. He mentioned in a meeting with President Xi Chinfing, how the direction of PM Modi and Chinfing has given a positive direction to bilateral relations. Ground work was important for the same visit to China. Earlier in June itself, National Security Advisor Ajit Doval and Defense Minister Rajnath also visited China.

The question is that despite such a tall relationship, how the two countries get close, then the answer will be that after the Modi-Jinping meeting in Russia last year, the ice of bilateral relationships was not melted, but also got immediate wounds like Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor, which led to both America-China. Earlier, the government of Sheikh Hasina, a pro -India from Bangladesh, was overturned. India also gave suicide silence here, which led to the encouragement of America-China.

It is fine that India restored tourist visas for China after a gap of five years on July 23 last. At the same time, its schedule was announced on 26 April after Kailash Mansarovar agreed earlier this year. At the same time, now positive discussion is going on about the restoration of direct flights.

In these circumstances, we have clear thinking that the US, Russia, China should be made clear on the table of negotiation that any anti -India steps will be tolerated in the neighboring countries of India, Arab countries, Aiyan countries of the Himalayas, because India is not only the Non -Aligned country but also the leader of Global South. If China agrees, then increase the love of love, otherwise put a fullstop. Doing so will be an economic and military attribute to us. This will also stop the fight after the India-China break.

– Kamlesh Pandey

Senior journalist and political analyst

(The author has his own views in this article.)

Source link

Leave a Comment