After the Pakistan -sponsored Hindu -religion Pahalgam terror attack, most of the people in India are now getting a question whether the real crusade i.e. the next Mahabharata is going to start, because due to continuous attacks, judicial and administrative discrimination against itself, the patience of Hindus is now standing on the verge of breaking! Experts say that the governments before independence and post -independence and their subordinate Supreme Court have introduced their anti -Hindu mindset and a lot of difference between their words and actions seems to be like a criminal instigation! The question is, how long will ‘Hindus’ bear judicial and administrative discrimination? And if the patience is broken then what will happen?
Therefore, there is a discussion in the public that now such a pressure should be made on the elected public representatives against such biased institutions and its basic sources of constitutional arrangements/laws. Because if the leaders understand this, then understand that there is sure to be a ruckus against it. Actually, I am not saying this, rather BJP MP Dr. Nishikant Dubey has raised these questions by analyzing the things that are somewhere, accusing the Supreme Court.
Also read this: In Pahalgam, when people were shot dead by asking religion, would it be called a terrorist incident or a jihadi attack?
Let me tell you that MP Dubey had said that “If someone is responsible for inciting a crusade in this country, he will be the Supreme Court and its judges!” That is why a big controversy arose from his allegation and the opposition strongly criticized him. But famous scientist, writer and speaker Anand Ranganathan has fully supported MP Dubey by releasing a video statement and Ranganathan has asked 9 questions asked by the Supreme Court in English. The court should take initiative to give its stand on this without delay, otherwise the misconceptions spread in the public can also question its existence.
In fact, Anand Ranganathan asks that, first, when the Modi government abolished Article 370 to remove the special status of Jammu and Kashmir, the Supreme Court immediately heard the petitions of the opposition and heard a special bench immediately. But in 1990, atrocities on Kashmiri Hindus- such as forced migration, occupation of houses, demolition of temples, murders, rapes, removing jobs- dismissed the petitions filed on the job, saying “It’s been a long time, we cannot open the matter.” He has raised the question that is it not a double standards? Will it not create resentment in Hindu society? Is this not a crusade provoking?
Second, the Supreme Court is concerned about the Waqf Board today, but in the last 30 years, the Waqf Board has illegally grabbed assets, parallel judicial system and tax- didn’t all these appear to the court? Today, if Islam seems to be in danger due to improvement of Waqf law, is it appropriate to build mosques and mausoleums on the lands of Hindus? The Waqf Board captured 2 million Hindu properties in the last 10 years – what else is the silence of the Supreme Court on this?
Third, why are the Hindu temple under the government, why are their income spent on madrasas, Haj pilgrimage, Waqf Board, Iftar Party, Debt etc.? At the same time, stopping Hindu religious works, hanging their petitions, always giving priority to minorities- is this justice? Or is there a way to create resentment in the mind of Hindu society?
Fourth, under the Right to Education, Hindu institutions have to reserve 25% seats for minorities. Whereas there is no such rule on Muslim and Christian institutions. This closed thousands of Hindu schools and Hindu children started studying in other religions institutions. Is this also not promoting conversion? Does the Supreme Court not see this bias?
Fifth, double policy on freedom of expression: Hate speech of Hindus, and others is considered free speech. Nupur Sharma only mentioned the Hadith- the court called him a hate speech. But Stalin and other leaders described Sanatan Dharma as “disease”- the court kept silence on him. Is this a fair justice?
Sixth, the Supreme Court banned Hindu traditions such as Dussehra’s Bali system, but during Halal, Eid, mass animal murder- no question on that. Ban at the height of Handi on Janmashtami, but no action on Moharram’s violence. Diwali crackers are bad for the environment, but not Christmas crackers. Isn’t this discrimination?
Seventh ,. The Places of Vership Act 1991 was made rigid in 2019, so that no changes could be made in the situation of religious places before August 15, 1947. This stopped the path to recover the ancient temples of Hindus. Years had to struggle for the Ram temple, the rest of the places are still in the possession of the heretics. Isn’t this historical injustice?
The court also hurt Hindu sentiments in the eighth, Shabriimala case. Some temples have men’s entry traditions in some, but the court targeted Hindus only. While in Islam, women are stopped from mosques, Quran etc., women cannot become a pastor in Christianity- so why there is no question on them?
The Supreme Court’s role on the riots that took place in the protest against the Nauva, Shaheenbagh movement and CAA. No concrete action was taken on the demonstration that stopped the public route. Is this not a fun of law? And does this also not increase resentment in Hindu society?
Therefore, the question arises that why do the judges of India discriminate against the original residents of this country, the residents of this country? And why is our civil administration silent even after all this? Is there not enough to understand these things and raise it in Parliament. Can bring impeachment in Parliament against such judges. Before this, all these things should be made a parliamentary debate, so that Indians can understand what is the opinion. Their leaders can explain them.
However, from the questions of Shri Ranganathan, it seems that not only governments but also our judicial establishments have appeared to be reflected in minority appeasement. Therefore, the Supreme Court should take automatic cognizance and constitute a judicial bench and make a decision one by one on all the allegations. Otherwise, if the Hindu public is excited, then its judicial freedom and the basic spirit of constitutional supremacy can also come to a standstill!
– Kamlesh Pandey
Senior journalist and political analyst