New Delhi14 minutes ago
- Copy link
Nishikant Dubey recently said in a statement that if the Supreme Court has to enact a law, then the Parliament and the Assembly should be closed. He also made controversial remarks on CJI.
The Supreme Court on Monday heard the contempt petition filed against BJP MP Nishikant Dubey. The court said- There is no need for court approval to file a petition. But for this, permission will have to be obtained from the Attorney General.
The petitioner had told the court that Nishikant had insulted the CJI and the judiciary. Can he file a contempt petition against Nishikant.
Actually, Nishikant Dubey had said that if the Supreme Court has to enact a law, then the Parliament and the Assembly should be closed. He also made controversial remarks on CJI. After this, lawyer Anas Tanveer, who is associated with the Waqf Act case, has written a letter to the Attorney General seeking permission for contempt against Dubey.
Congress bid- try to weaken the Supreme Court
Assam CM reverses Congress
Assam Chief Minister and BJP leader Himanta Biswa Sarma has retaliated on the Congress by taking over the front. Sarma said that the BJP has always respected the independence and dignity of the judiciary.
He cited BJP president JP Nadda, saying that Nishikant Dubey and Dinesh Sharma’s comments are not the party’s opinion, but their personal views. Nadda has also advised the leaders to avoid such statements.
Himant said- Congress targeted the judiciary several times
However, Sarma then attacked the Congress and said that the Congress has targeted the judiciary several times. Giving examples of this, he said- Congress and other opposition parties brought impeachment motion against CJI Deepak Mishra without concrete evidence.
Sarma also gave other examples, he said- Justice Ranjan Gogoi faced criticism after historical decisions like Ayodhya. Justice Arun Mishra was targeted for his decisions.
At the same time, Justice DY Chandrachud was also questioned about decisions in controversial cases. The Congress questioned the independence of the judiciary on the appointment of Justice Abdul Nazir’s Governor.
Nishikant shared the post of Himanta and wrote shayari …
Now read BJP MP Nishikant’s recent statements …
April 19: Nishikant said- Court is going out of its limits
BJP MP Nishikant Dubey said on April 19 that the court is going out of its boundaries. If everyone has to go to the Supreme Court for all matters, then Parliament and Assembly should be closed.
He said, ‘Parliament enacts the law of this country. Will you instruct that Parliament? Chief Justice of India Sanjeev Khanna is responsible for the civil war in the country. The Supreme Court is responsible for inciting religious war. Read full news ….
April 20: Nishikant said- Qureshi was not the Election Commissioner, was a Muslim commissioner
BJP MP Nishikant Dubey said on 20 April that former Chief Election Commissioner SY Qureshi targeted. The BJP MP said, “He was not an Election Commissioner but a Muslim commissioner.”
Nishikant’s statement came in response to a post criticizing Qureshi’s Waqf law. On April 17, Qureshi wrote in a post on X, “Waqf amendment is the terrible and devilish trick of the government to grab the land of Muslims.” Read full news …
BJP opposed Dubey’s statements
The BJP opted out of Nishikant Dubey’s statement against the Supreme Court and Chief Justice of India. National President JP Nadda wrote in the X post- BJP neither keeps any coincidence with such statements nor supports such statements. The BJP dismisses these statements outright. The party has always respected the judiciary, has gladly accepted their orders and suggestions, because as a party we believe that all the courts of the country including the Supreme Court are integral to our democracy. There is a strong foundation for the protection of the Constitution. I have directed both of them and everyone not to make such statements.
What has happened on the dispute so far…
8 April: Controversy started with Supreme Court verdict
The Supreme Court had set the limit of the authority of the Governor in the case of the Tamil Nadu Governor and the State Government on 8 April. The bench of Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice R. Mahadevan had said, “The Governor has no veto power.” The Supreme Court also termed the government’s 10 essential bills being stopped by the Governor as illegal.
During this decision, the court also clarified the situation on the bill sent by the Governors to the President. The Supreme Court had said that the President would have to take a decision on the bill sent by the Governor within 3 months. The order was made public on 11 April. Read full news …
17 April: Dhankhar said- courts cannot order the President
Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar was addressing a group of Rajya Sabha intern on 17 April. During this time, he objected to the advice of the Supreme Court, in which the President and the governors had set a deadline for approving the bills.
Dhankhar had said- “The courts cannot order the President. The special rights under Article 142 of the Constitution have become 24×7 available nuclear missile against democratic powers. Judges are acting as a super parliamentary.” Read full news …
April 18: Sibal said- President nominal head in India
Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal said that when the executive does not work, the judiciary will have to intervene. The President is the head of the nominal head in India. The President-Governor has to work on the advice of governments. I am surprised to hear the Vice President, I am also sad. They should not talk to any party.
Referring to a decision of the Supreme Court on 24 June 1975, Sibal said- ‘People will remember when the decision on Indira Gandhi’s election came, only one judge, Justice Krishna Iyer ruled. At that time Indira had to lose Sansadi. Then Dhankhar ji approved this. But now the decision of the two -judge bench against the government is being questioned. Read full news …
—————————