Mumbai6 minutes ago
- Copy link
Dalat also saw the statements of the three girls and said, “After reading the three statements, it cannot be said that the applicant somehow entertained, threatened, greed or forced these girls.”
The Bombay High Court has granted bail to an accused in Mumbai in a case of smuggling of minor girls and body trade. The accused was kept in jail before the trial for more than 2 years.
The court said during the hearing on Tuesday that there is no concrete and direct evidence against the accused. The role of the wife of the accused is more serious in this case and when she has been granted bail, the accused can also be released.
Hearing a bail plea, a single bench of Justice Milind Jadhav said, “Jail of more than 2 years without a trial, the charges have not been framed so far and there is no possibility of completion of trial in the near future – all these things go in favor of granting him bail.”
The court also looked at the statements of the three girls and said, “After reading the three statements, it cannot be said that the applicant somehow entertained, threatened, lured or forced these girls.”
What is the whole matter…
Navi Mumbai Police registered an FIR in this case in the year 2023. Police had received information that a woman provides minor girls for body trade. After this, the police laid a trap by creating a fake customer. The woman allegedly agreed to bring three girls for Rs 35,000 and arrived at a fixed place with an autorickshaw. On reaching there, the police caught the woman and rescued the three girls.
Minor victim girl is not getting police
According to the prosecution, one of these girls was 17 years 11 months, the second was 18 years 10 months and the third was 20 years and 10 months. The court also said that only one girl in them was legally minor, but she is no longer getting the police and as proof of her age, only the Ocification Test Report is in the charge sheet, in which her age is described as 17 years and 11 months.
March 14: Bombay High Court granted bail to POCSO accused
The Bombay High Court in a decision on Monday granted bail to a 22 -year -old youth who has been jailed for 3 years on charges of rape from a minor. The bench of Justice Milind Jadhav said that the 15 -year -old minor knew what she was doing, she also knew the results.
The bench said in its order- It is clear from the girl’s statement that the two had love affairs and physical relations were made by consent. The girl left her house on her own free will and went with the young man.
The court also notice that when the girl called the family and told that she was in a village in Uttar Pradesh, she did not take any action. The bench said that despite the provision of the law being tough, bail cannot be denied in the interest of justice, especially when the case has been pending for four years and the trial has not started yet. Read full news …
April 10: Allahabad High Court blames the victim student responsible for rape
‘Even if the allegations of the victim are accepted correct, the conclusion can be reached that he himself invited trouble. He is also responsible for the rape himself. The medical examination found the hymen broken, but the doctor did not talk about sexual violence.
This comment was made by Allahabad High Court Justice Sanjay Kumar Singh. On April 10, the court granted bail to the rape accused and said, “Sex was done with the consent of both.” This case of rape is in September 2024. Read full news …
This order of Allahabad High Court was also in discussion, read …
In the second week of March, the Allahabad High Court had said in a case related to the rape case, “Breast pressing and breaking the string of pajamas cannot be considered an attempt to rape.” This comment was made by the bench of Justice Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra of Allahabad High Court. Justice Mishra accepted the Criminal Revision Petition filed against 3 accused.
The Supreme Court had taken suo motu cognizance of this case. The bench of Justice BR Gawai and Justice AG Christ heard. The bench said, “Some of the comments made in the High Court order show completely insensitive and inhuman attitude.” The Supreme Court issued notice to the Center, Uttar Pradesh government and other parties seeking answers.
A bench of Justice BR Gawai and Justice AG Christ said-
This is a very serious matter and a lot of insensitivity was shown from the judge who gave this decision. We are very sad to say that there was a complete lack of sensitivity in the decision -making person.
The Supreme Court had said that it is against both humanity and law. Such comments reflect ‘insensitivity’ and are beyond the parameters of the law. Read full news …
————————————
Read this Excellener related to the decision of the High Court on rape …
After the liquor party raped the student, the High Court bails the accused by blaming the victim; What is law and punishment
Even if the allegations of rape of the victim are accepted correct, the conclusion can be reached that he himself had invited trouble and he is also responsible for the rape itself. On Thursday, Justice Sanjay Kumar Singh of Allahabad High Court granted bail to the rape accused. Read full news …